4.6 Review

Toll-like Receptors as Pro-Thrombotic Drivers in Viral Infections: A Narrative Review

Journal

CELLS
Volume 12, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells12141865

Keywords

toll-like receptors; glycocalyx; SARS-CoV-2 infection; platelet activation; micro-thrombosis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Toll-like receptors (TLRs) play a critical role in viral infections by inducing pro-inflammatory responses and disrupting vascular homeostasis. The injury to the vessel wall leads to pro-thrombotic processes and eventually causes micro-vessel plugging and tissue necrosis. TLRs also directly contribute to virus sensing and platelet activation. Upregulation of von Willebrand factor release and extra-cellular trap formation by TLRs further enhance thrombotic processes during inflammation. This review focuses on TLR signaling pathways in humans, which provoke pro-thrombotic responses during viral infections, particularly in individuals with cardiovascular diseases.
Toll-like receptors (TLRs) have a critical role in the pathogenesis and disease course of viral infections. The induced pro-inflammatory responses result in the disturbance of the endovascular surface layer and impair vascular homeostasis. The injury of the vessel wall further promotes pro-thrombotic and pro-coagulatory processes, eventually leading to micro-vessel plugging and tissue necrosis. Moreover, TLRs have a direct role in the sensing of viruses and platelet activation. TLR-mediated upregulation of von Willebrand factor release and neutrophil, as well as macrophage extra-cellular trap formation, further contribute to (micro-) thrombotic processes during inflammation. The following review focuses on TLR signaling pathways of TLRs expressed in humans provoking pro-thrombotic responses, which determine patient outcome during viral infections, especially in those with cardiovascular diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available