4.7 Article

Flexible multichannel electrodes for acute recording in nonhuman primates

Journal

MICROSYSTEMS & NANOENGINEERING
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41378-023-00550-y

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Flexible electrodes have shown better compatibility and functionality compared to rigid electrodes. Nonhuman primates, which have similar brain structures and functions to humans, are more suitable as animal models for potential clinical usage than rodents. However, there are limited studies regarding the application of flexible electrodes on nonhuman primates.
Flexible electrodes have demonstrated better biocompatibility than rigid electrodes in relieving tissue encapsulation and long-term recording. Nonhuman primates are closer to humans in their brains' structural and functional properties, thus making them more suitable than rodents as animal models for potential clinical usage. However, the application of flexible electrodes on nonhuman primates has rarely been reported. In the present study, a flexible multichannel electrode array for nonhuman primates was developed and implemented for extracellular recording in behaving monkeys. To minimize the window of durotomy for reducing possible risks, a guide-tube-compatible implantation solution was designed to deliver the flexible electrodes through the dura into the cortex. The proposed structure for inserting flexible electrodes was characterized ex vivo and validated in vivo. Furthermore, acute recording of multichannel flexible electrodes for the primates was performed. The results showed that the flexible electrodes and implantation method used in this study meet the needs of extracellular recording in nonhuman primates. Task-related neuronal activities with a high signal-to-noise ratio of spikes demonstrated that our whole device is currently a minimally invasive and clinically viable approach for extracellular recording.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available