4.8 Article

The Atlantic salmon genome provides insights into rediploidization

Journal

NATURE
Volume 533, Issue 7602, Pages 200-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature17164

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Research Council of Norway (NFR)
  2. Norwegian Seafood Research Fund
  3. Genome BC
  4. Chilean Economic Development Agency - CORFO and InnovaChile Committee
  5. Marine Harvest
  6. AquaGen
  7. Cermaq
  8. Salmobreed
  9. NFR [208481/F50, 226266, 225181, 221734/030]
  10. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC), Canada
  11. University of Victoria
  12. ARS [ARS-0427931, 813654] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The whole-genome duplication 80 million years ago of the common ancestor of salmonids (salmonid-specific fourth vertebrate whole-genome duplication, Ss4R) provides unique opportunities to learn about the evolutionary fate of a duplicated vertebrate genome in 70 extant lineages. Here we present a high-quality genome assembly for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), and show that large genomic reorganizations, coinciding with bursts of transposon-mediated repeat expansions, were crucial for the post-Ss4R rediploidization process. Comparisons of duplicate gene expression patterns across a wide range of tissues with orthologous genes from a pre-Ss4R outgroup unexpectedly demonstrate far more instances of neofunctionalization than subfunctionalization. Surprisingly, we find that genes that were retained as duplicates after the teleost-specific whole-genome duplication 320 million years ago were not more likely to be retained after the Ss4R, and that the duplicate retention was not influenced to a great extent by the nature of the predicted protein interactions of the gene products. Finally, we demonstrate that the Atlantic salmon assembly can serve as a reference sequence for the study of other salmonids for a range of purposes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available