4.6 Review

Adequate Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Radical Cystectomy in the Era of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Journal

CANCERS
Volume 15, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers15164040

Keywords

bladder cancer; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; radical cystectomy; lymphadenectomy; survival analysis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The number of lymph nodes removed during radical cystectomy can affect the prognosis of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. However, this study found that for patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, pelvic lymphadenectomy did not have a significant impact on survival outcomes.
Radical cystectomy (RC) with pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND) serves as the gold-standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Numerous studies have shown that the number of lymph nodes (LN) removed during RC could affect patient prognosis. However, these studies confirmed the association between PLND and survival outcomes prior to the widespread adoption of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Consequently, this study aimed to investigate the prognostic role of PLND in patients previously pretreated with NAC. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed using PubMed, Web of Knowledge, and Scopus databases. The selected studies contained a total of 17,421 participants. The meta-analysis indicated a significant correlation between adequate PLND and overall survival in the non-NAC group. However, a survival benefit was not observed in patients undergoing RC with preoperative systemic therapy, regardless of the LN cut-off thresholds. The pooled HR for >= 10 and >= 15 LN were 0.87 (95% CI 0.75-1.01) and 0.87 (95% CI 0.76-1.00), respectively. The study results suggest that NAC mitigates the therapeutic significance of PLND, as patients pre-treated with NAC no longer gain oncological benefits from more extensive lymphadenectomy. This highlights the analogous roles of NAC and PLND in eradication of micrometastases and in prevention of distal recurrence post-RC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available