4.7 Article

Analysis of Urinary Glycosaminoglycans to Predict Outcome in COVID-19 and Community-Acquired Pneumonia-A Proof-of-Concept Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12165269

Keywords

COVID-19; 1,9-dimethylmethylene blue (DMMB); endothelial glycocalyx; glycosaminoglycans; community-acquired pneumonia; endothelial dysfunction; endotheliopathy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Measuring urinary concentration of sulphated glycosaminoglycans (sGAGs) can serve as a method to assess disease severity and outcome in patients with COVID-19 and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).
Although coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is considered a systemic disease associated with vascular inflammation and eventual destruction of the protective endothelial glycocalyx (eGC), biomarkers of eGC damage are not yet available in the clinic. The most prominent components of eGC are sulphated glycosaminoglycans (sGAGs) attached to core proteoglycans. We hypothesised that the amount of sGAG fragments shed in urine (as a surrogate for systemic eGC damage) would correlate with disease severity and outcome. Total urinary sGAG concentration was measured using an in-house optimised 1,9-dimethylmethylene blue (DMMB) assay, which is highly accurate and insensitive to interferences. The median urinary sGAG concentration was significantly higher in 67 hospitalised patients with COVID-19 compared to 72 hospitalised patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). In both groups, urinary sGAG concentrations predicted a combined endpoint (including intubation and death) with an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.72 (95% CI 0.55-0.88, p = 0.01) and 0.70 (95% CI 0.57-0.83, p = 0.007), respectively. In conclusion, the inexpensive and easy-to-perform DMMB assay provides a surrogate parameter for eGC damage that may be useful for risk stratification of patients with COVID-19 and CAP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available