4.7 Review

Harnessing Immune Response in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 18, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12185824

Keywords

AML; immunotherapy; CAR-T; NK cells

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite advancements in conventional chemotherapy and targeted therapies, the survival rate for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains unsatisfactory, particularly for relapsed/refractory or elderly/unfit patients. Cellular therapy has shown promising results in other hematological malignancies but has not been approved for clinical use in AML. Cellular therapy could be a powerful alternative to stem cell transplantation for ineligible patients.
Despite the results achieved with the evolution of conventional chemotherapy and the inclusion of targeted therapies in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), survival is still not satisfying, in particular in the setting of relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease or elderly/unfit patients. Among the most innovative therapeutic options, cellular therapy has shown great results in different hematological malignancies such as acute lymphoblastic leukemia and lymphomas, with several products already approved for clinical use. However, despite the great interest in also expanding the application of these new treatments to R/R AML, no product has been approved yet for clinical application. Furthermore, cellular therapy could indeed represent a powerful tool and an appealing alternative to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for ineligible patients. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of the most recent clinical research exploring the effectiveness of cellular therapy in AML, moving from consolidated approaches such as post- transplant donor's lymphocytes infusion, to modern adoptive immunotherapies such as alloreactive NK cell infusions, engineered T and NK cells (CAR-T, CAR-NK) and novel platforms of T and NK cells engaging (i.e., BiTEs, DARTs and ANKETTM).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available