Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Marker Screw Utilization for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MS-MIS TLIF): Promises and Advantages
Mohammed Khashab et al.
MEDICINA-LITHUANIA (2023)
Ten-Year Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients With Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
Ji-Won Kwon et al.
SPINE (2022)
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective, controlled observational study of short-term outcome
Sebastian Hartmann et al.
NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW (2022)
Minimising radiation exposure to the surgeon in minimally invasive spine surgeries: A systematic review of 15 studies
Shahswar Arif et al.
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH (2021)
Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: Techniques, Technologies, and Indications
Jiwon Park et al.
ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL (2020)
Comparison of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Interbody Lumbar Fusion
Chi Heon Kim et al.
GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL (2020)
Defining the MIS-TLIF: A Systematic Review of Techniques and Technologies Used by Surgeons Worldwide
Sara Lener et al.
GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL (2020)
Open versus minimally invasive TLIF: literature review and meta-analysis
Ahmed Hammad et al.
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH (2019)
Comparative Analysis of Two Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Techniques Open TLIF Versus Wiltse MIS TLIF
David H. Ge et al.
SPINE (2019)
Minimally invasive spine surgery in lumbar spondylodiscitis: a retrospective single-center analysis of 67 cases
Anja Tschugg et al.
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL (2017)
Three-year postoperative outcomes between MIS and conventional TLIF in 1-segment lumbar disc herniation
You Lv et al.
MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES (2017)
Minimally Invasive Surgery Versus Open Surgery Spinal Fusion for Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Victor M. Lu et al.
SPINE (2017)
Comparison of the Total and Hidden Blood Loss in Patients Undergoing Open and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Hui Zhang et al.
WORLD NEUROSURGERY (2017)
Hidden and overall haemorrhage following minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
Yang Yang et al.
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY (2017)
Minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
Arvind G. Kulkarni et al.
INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS (2016)
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar fusion: a systematic review of complications
Wei Hu et al.
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS (2016)
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Disk Disease and Spondylolisthesis Grade I Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery
Giovanni B. Brodano et al.
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES (2015)
A Prospective, Multi-Institutional Comparative Effectiveness Study of Lumbar Spine Surgery in Morbidly Obese Patients: Does Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Result in Superior Outcomes?
Owoicho Adogwa et al.
WORLD NEUROSURGERY (2015)
Comparison of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in two-level degenerative lumbar disease
Guangfei Gu et al.
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS (2014)
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of clinical outcomes among obese patients
Samuel W. Terman et al.
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE (2014)
Comparison of the Clinical Outcome in Overweight or Obese Patients After Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Jian Wang et al.
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES (2014)
A perioperative cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
Kern Singh et al.
SPINE JOURNAL (2014)
Minimally Invasive versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Comparative Effectiveness and Cost-Utility Analysis
Scott L. Parker et al.
WORLD NEUROSURGERY (2014)
The early changes in trunk muscle strength and disability following lumbar spine fusion
Sami Tarnanen et al.
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION (2013)
Clinical outcomes of minimally invasive versus open approach for one-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at the 3-to 4-year follow-up
Javier Rodriguez-Vela et al.
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL (2013)
Comparison of minimally invasive fusion and instrumentation versus open surgery for severe stenotic spondylolisthesis with high-grade facet joint osteoarthritis
Eleftherios Archavlis et al.
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL (2013)
Short-term and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions: is there a difference?
Jason S. Cheng et al.
NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS (2013)
Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in obese patients
Darryl Lau et al.
NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS (2013)
Five-Year Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion A Matched-Pair Comparison Study
Chusheng Seng et al.
SPINE (2013)
Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
Kong Hwee Lee et al.
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL (2012)
Minimally invasive surgery compared to open spinal fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine pathologies
Ralph J. Mobbs et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE (2012)
A Comparison of Perioperative Costs and Outcomes in Patients With and Without Workers' Compensation Claims Treated With Minimally Invasive or Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Miguel A. Pelton et al.
SPINE (2012)
The Effect of Early Initiation of Rehabilitation After Lumbar Spinal Fusion A Randomized Clinical Study
Lisa G. Oestergaard et al.
SPINE (2012)
Cost-Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Associated Low-Back and Leg Pain Over Two Years
Scott L. Parker et al.
WORLD NEUROSURGERY (2012)
Complications and perioperative factors associated with learning the technique of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)
Darryl Lau et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE (2011)
Comparative Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion 2-year Assessment of Narcotic Use, Return to Work, Disability, and Quality of Life
Owoicho Adogwa et al.
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES (2011)
Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2
Jian Wang et al.
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL (2010)
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion A Review of Techniques and Outcomes
Isaac O. Karikari et al.
SPINE (2010)
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Diseases
Fan Shunwu et al.
SPINE (2010)
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: evaluating initial experience
Constantin Schizas et al.
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS (2009)
Significantly Improved Outcomes With a Less Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Incorporating Total Facetectomy
Ata G. Kasis et al.
SPINE (2009)
Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Chan Wearn Benedict Peng et al.
SPINE (2009)
Comparison of low back fusion techniques: transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) or posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) approaches
Chad D. Cole et al.
CURRENT REVIEWS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL MEDICINE (2009)
Comparison of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach or a traditional open approach
Yung Park et al.
SPINE (2007)
The quantitative analysis of tissue injury markers after mini-open lumbar fusion
KT Kim et al.
SPINE (2006)
Share Paper
