4.7 Article

Periosteal Dry Needling for Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Case Series

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 17, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12175678

Keywords

dry needling; osteoarthritis; carpometacarpal joint; thumb pain; periosteal; CMC OA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that dry needling (DN) treatment resulted in significant improvements in pain and function in patients with Carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis (OA) of the thumb. After six sessions of DN treatment over 12 weeks, there were significant improvements in thumb pain and function.
Background: Carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis (OA) of the thumb is a painful condition that affects over 15% of individuals above the age of 30 and up to 30% of post-menopausal women. Dry needling (DN) has been found to reduce pain and disability in a variety of neuromusculoskeletal conditions; however, DN in the management of CMC OA has not been well studied. Methods: Consecutive patients with clinical and radiographic evidence of CMC OA were treated with DN. The primary outcome measure was pain using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) at 12 weeks. Secondary outcome measures were the Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI-20) and the Global Rating of Change (GROC) scale. Outcome measures were collected at baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks. Results: Nine patients were treated for six sessions of periosteal DN over 3 weeks. Compared to baseline, statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements were observed in thumb pain (NPRS mean difference: 2.6; p = 0.029) and function (UEFI-20 mean difference: 21.3; p = 0.012) at 12 weeks. Conclusion: Statistically significant and clinically meaningful within-group improvements in thumb pain and function were observed at 12 weeks following six sessions of periosteal DN treatment. DN may be a useful intervention in the management of patients with CMC OA of the thumb.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available