4.7 Article

Exploring the Effect of Preoperative Stereopsis on Visual Outcomes in Hyperopic Presbyopes Treated with PresbyOND® Laser Blended Vision Micro-Monovision

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 19, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12196399

Keywords

PresbyOND (R) Laser Blended Vision; Preoperative Stereopsis; hyperopic presbyopes; micro-monovision; refractive treatment efficacy; Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UDVA); Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (CDVA); binocular summation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the effects of Laser Blended Vision (LBV) on binocular summation and stereopsis in the treatment of presbyopia and hyperopia. The results showed that stereopsis quality significantly influenced short-term post-operative visual outcomes, but its impact diminished over time, becoming statistically insignificant at the 12-month post-operative mark. Future studies are needed to understand the enduring clinical ramifications of these observations.
We investigated the effects of Laser Blended Vision (LBV) on binocular summation and stereopsis in the treatment of presbyopia and hyperopia. Using a unidirectional, retrospective longitudinal design, data from 318 patients who underwent the Zeiss PresbyOND (R) LBV surgical procedure at Tecnolaser Clinic Vision Ophthalmology Center in Seville, Spain, were analyzed. The findings indicate that stereopsis quality significantly influenced short-term post-operative visual outcomes in measures like Uncorrected Distance and Near Visual Acuity (UDVA and UNVA). However, the impact of stereopsis on visual outcomes appeared to diminish over time, becoming statistically insignificant at the 12-month post-operative mark. The study suggests that while stereopsis is a crucial factor in the short term, its influence on visual outcomes tends to wane in the long-term postoperative period. Future studies are essential to elucidate the enduring clinical ramifications of these observations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available