4.7 Review

Management of Cervical Spinal Cord Injury without Major Bone Injury in Adults

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 21, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12216795

Keywords

cervical spinal cord injury; no major bone injury; management

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The incidence of cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) without major bone injury is increasing, particularly among older individuals with pre-existing cervical spinal canal stenosis. The demographics, neurological injury, treatment, and prognosis of this type of CSCI differ from those with bone or central cord injury. The optimal management of CSCI without major bone injury is a subject of debate among spine surgeons worldwide. This narrative review aims to address unresolved clinical questions and discuss treatment strategies based on current findings.
The incidence of cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) without major bone injury is increasing, possibly because older people typically have pre-existing cervical spinal canal stenosis. The demographics, neurological injury, treatment, and prognosis of this type of CSCI differ from those of CSCI with bone or central cord injury. Spine surgeons worldwide are debating on the optimal management of CSCI without major bone injury. Therefore, this narrative review aimed to address unresolved clinical questions related to CSCI without major bone injury and discuss treatment strategies based on current findings. The greatest divide among spine surgeons worldwide hinges on whether surgery is necessary for patients with CSCI without major bone injury. Certain studies have recommended early surgery within 24 h after injury; however, evidence regarding its superiority over conservative treatment remains limited. Delayed MRI may be beneficial; nevertheless, reliable factors and imaging findings that predict functional prognosis during the acute phase and ascertain the necessity of surgery should be identified to determine whether surgery/early surgery is better than conservative therapy/delayed surgery. Quality-of-life assessments, including neuropathic pain, spasticity, manual dexterity, and motor function, should be performed to examine the superiority of surgery/early surgery to conservative therapy/delayed surgery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available