4.7 Review

Personality Traits and Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis: A Narrative Review

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 13, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134518

Keywords

multiple sclerosis; personality traits; fatigue; neurodegenerative disease; big five factor

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the relationship between personality traits and fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). The findings suggest a correlation between neuroticism and fatigue, but there is inconsistency in the assessment of fatigue, personality, and covariates. Further homogeneous and longitudinal studies are needed to draw firm conclusions.
(1) Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neurodegenerative autoimmune disease. Fatigue is a prevalent and debilitating symptom that significantly impacts the quality of life of these patients. A relationship between personality traits and fatigue in MS has been hypothesized but not clearly defined. (2) Methods: A literature search was carried out from databases up to April 2023 for studies correlating personality traits and fatigue in patients suffering from MS. (3) Results: A total of ten articles was included; most of the studies depict a neuroticism-fatigue correlation; however, they were not consistent in terms of the fatigue, personality, and covariate assessments. (4) Conclusions: The clinical and methodological heterogeneity of the included studies prevented us from drawing any firm conclusion on the link between personality traits and fatigue in MS. Several models of personality and different fatigue assessments have been found. Despite this, a common pathway shows that the neuroticism trait or similar personality patterns has a role in fatigue diagnosis. This may be a useful target to improve the quality of life and enhance the modification of the disease treatment results. Further homogeneous and longitudinal studies are needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available