4.7 Article

The Safety of a High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Neuromuscular Disease Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure: A Retrospective Case-Series Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 18, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12186061

Keywords

non-invasive ventilation; high-flow nasal cannula; acute respiratory failure; neuromuscular disease

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to investigate the safety profile of High-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) in Neuromuscular Disease (NMD) patients intolerant to Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) for Acute Respiratory Failure (ARF). The results showed that HFNC used during the daytime alongside nocturnal NIV appeared to be a safe therapeutic approach for ARF patients with NMD. However, continuous use of HFNC was associated with an increased risk of treatment failure.
(1) Background: Although Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) is effective in preventing mortality and endotracheal intubation in patients with Acute Respiratory Failure (ARF) linked to a neuromuscular disorder, its efficacy can be affected by patient intolerance. A High-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) appears to have a significant advantage over NIV as far as patient tolerance is concerned. The aim of the study was to investigate HFNC's safety profile in a group of consecutive Neuromuscular Disease (NMD) patients intolerant to NIV who were admitted to an Intermediate Respiratory Care Unit (IRCU) for ARF. (2) Methods: The clinical course of nine NMD patients intolerant to NIV and switched to HFNC was reported. HFNC was provided during daytime hours and NIV during the night-time to the NIV-intolerant patients. HFNC was utilized 24 h a day in those patients who were intolerant of even nocturnal NIV. (3) Results: HFNC was simple to use and it was well tolerated by all of the patients. Three out of nine patients experienced treatment failure, consisting of the need for ETI and/or death during their IRCU stay. The remaining 6 had a favorable outcome. Treatment failure was linked to the utilization of HFNC 24 h a day. (4) Conclusion: HFNC during the daytime hours, together with nocturnal NIV, seems to be a safe therapeutic approach for NMD patients with ARF. A round-the-clock use of HFNC tends to be linked to a high likelihood of failure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available