4.7 Article

Observational Study of Repeat Immunoadsorption (RIA) in Post-COVID ME/CFS Patients with Elevated ß2-Adrenergic Receptor Autoantibodies-An Interim Report

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 19, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12196428

Keywords

autoantibodies; immunoadsorption; SF-36; physical function; long COVID; GPCR-antibodies; post-COVID syndrome; Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is increasing evidence suggesting an autoimmune cause for post-infectious Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS), with SARS-CoV-2 being the main trigger. A small proof-of-concept study on IgG depletion using immunoadsorption (IA) showed efficacy in most patients with post-infectious ME/CFS. An ongoing observational study aims to evaluate the efficacy of IA in post-COVID-19 ME/CFS patients.
There is increasing evidence for an autoimmune aetiology in post-infectious Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS). SARS-CoV-2 has now become the main trigger for ME/CFS. We have already conducted two small proof-of-concept studies on IgG depletion by immunoadsorption (IA) in post-infectious ME/CFS, which showed efficacy in most patients. This observational study aims to evaluate the efficacy of IA in patients with post-COVID-19 ME/CFS. The primary objective was to assess the improvement in functional ability. Due to the urgency of finding therapies for post-COVID-Syndrome (PCS), we report here the interim results of the first ten patients, with seven responders defined by an increase of between 10 and 35 points in the Short-Form 36 Physical Function (SF36-PF) at week four after IA. The results of this observational study will provide the basis for patient selection for a randomised controlled trial (RCT), including sham apheresis, and for an RCT combining IA with B-cell depletion therapy. Trial registration number: NCT05629988.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available