4.7 Article

Myocardial Work in Middle-Aged Adults with Overweight and Obesity: Associations with Sex and Central Arterial Stiffness

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 17, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12175676

Keywords

global myocardial work; arterial function; sex; obesity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the relation between global myocardial work index (GWI) and sex and increased body mass index (BMI). The results showed that women had higher GWI, which was mainly explained by increased left ventricular (LV) workload due to higher aortic augmentation pressure in women.
We explored global myocardial work index (GWI), a novel measure of myocardial function that integrates left ventricular (LV) hemodynamic load, in relation to sex and increased body mass index (BMI). We used data from 467 individuals (61% women, average age 47 +/- 9 years and BMI 31.2 kg/m(2)) without known cardiac disease. Central arterial function was analysed by applanation tonometry. GWI was calculated from global longitudinal strain (GLS) and post-echocardiography supine blood pressure (BP). Covariables of GWI were identified in linear regression analyses. Women had higher BMI, aortic augmentation pressure (12 +/- 7 vs. 8 +/- 6 mmHg), LV GLS (20.0 +/- 2.8 vs. 18.8 +/- 2.8%), and GWI (2126 +/- 385 vs. 2047 +/- 389 mmHg%) than men (all p < 0.05). In univariable analyses, higher GWI was associated with female sex, higher age, systolic BP, LV wall stress, LV ejection fraction, left atrial size, LV ejection time, and with lower waist circumference (all p < 0.05). In multivariable analysis, adjusting for these correlates, female sex remained independently associated with higher GWI (b = 0.13, p = 0.007). After additional adjustment for aortic augmentation pressure or central pulse pressure, this association became non-significant. In conclusion, the higher GWI in women compared to men was mainly explained by increased LV workload due to higher aortic augmentation pressure in women.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available