4.7 Review

Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision for Low Rectal Cancer: A Narrative Review and Description of the Technique

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Surgery

Robotic surgery for clinical T4 rectal cancer: short- and long-term outcomes

Yusuke Yamaoka et al.

Summary: This retrospective cohort study of 122 patients undergoing robotic surgery for cT4 rectal cancer showed favorable short- and long-term outcomes, with improved survival rates and reduced risks of postoperative complications and local recurrence. Robotic surgery is considered to be an effective approach for treating cT4 rectal cancer.

SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2022)

Review Oncology

Robotic-Assisted vs. Standard Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 19,731 Patients

Kamil Safiejko et al.

Summary: Robotic-assisted surgery has several advantages over laparoscopic surgery in patients undergoing curative surgery for rectal cancer, including shorter operative time, significantly lower conversion to open surgery, shorter duration of hospital stay, lower risk of urinary retention, and improved survival to hospital discharge or 30-day overall survival rate.

CANCERS (2022)

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Long term oncological outcomes for laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer - A population-based nationwide noninferiority study

Kaveh Dehlaghi Jadid et al.

Summary: This study compared the 5-year overall survival in patients undergoing laparoscopic or open abdominal resection for rectal cancer and found that laparoscopic surgery was not inferior to open surgery in terms of overall 5-year survival.

COLORECTAL DISEASE (2022)

Article Surgery

Lower conversion rate with robotic assisted rectal resections compared with conventional laparoscopy; a national cohort study

Elisabeth Myrseth et al.

Summary: A study from Norway showed that robotic-assisted rectal resections have a lower conversion rate compared to conventional laparoscopy, with conversions being associated with increased risk of postoperative complications.

SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2022)

Article Oncology

Clinical Safety and Effectiveness of Robotic-Assisted Surgery in Patients with Rectal Cancer: Real-World Experience over 8 Years of Multiple Institutions with High-Volume Robotic-Assisted Surgery

Ching-Wen Huang et al.

Summary: This retrospective observational study evaluated the perioperative and short-term oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted rectal surgery (RRS) in hospitals with a high-volume of robotic-assisted surgeries. The results showed equivalent or superior perioperative and short-term oncological outcomes compared to other studies, indicating that RRS is an effective, safe, and feasible technique for patients with rectal cancers in high-volume hospitals.

CANCERS (2022)

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer (REAL): short-term outcomes of a multicentre randomised controlled trial

Qingyang Feng et al.

Summary: Robotic surgery for rectal cancer showed better oncological quality of resection, less surgical trauma, and better postoperative recovery compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery in patients with middle and low rectal cancer.

LANCET GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY (2022)

Article Surgery

Robotic vs. laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a case matched study reporting a median of 7-year long-term oncological and functional outcomes

Vusal Aliyev et al.

Summary: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic intersphincteric resection in low-lying rectal cancer. The analysis showed that robotic-assisted surgery had better mesorectal integrity, no conversion, and lower postoperative complication rate compared to laparoscopic surgery. However, robotic-assisted surgery had a longer operation time. The oncological and anorectal functional outcomes were similar in both groups.

UPDATES IN SURGERY (2022)

Article Oncology

Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Bo Tang et al.

Summary: Robotic surgery for rectal cancer was found to be comparable to laparoscopic surgery in terms of postoperative complications within 30 days, based on the results of this meta-analysis.

WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY (2021)

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Robot Surgery Shows Similar Long-term Oncologic Outcomes as Laparoscopic Surgery for Mid/Lower Rectal Cancer but Is Beneficial to ypT3/4 After Preoperative Chemoradiation

Soo Yeun Park et al.

Summary: This study found that robotic surgery and laparoscopic surgery have similar long-term oncologic outcomes for patients with mid/low rectal cancer. However, robotic surgery may provide benefits for patients with advanced rectal cancer who have a poor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM (2021)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

The Emerging Role of Robotics in Pelvic Exenteration Surgery for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Narrative Review

Tou Pin Chang et al.

Summary: Pelvic exenteration surgery for locally advanced rectal cancers is a complex and extensive multivisceral operation with high perioperative morbidity and mortality rates. Robotic-assisted technologies have significantly advanced the minimally invasive approach to total mesorectal excision for rectal cancers in the past two decades, providing emerging experience and evidence in addressing operative challenges and ergonomic issues in beyond TME multivisceral pelvic exenteration for locally advanced rectal cancers.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE (2021)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Update on Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer

Simona Giuratrabocchetta et al.

Summary: Minimally invasive treatment of rectal cancer with Total Mesorectal Excision is complex and challenging, with robotic surgery offering advantages in dexterity but cost and benefits still need further evaluation.

JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE (2021)

Article Surgery

Laparoscopic and open surgery in rectal cancer patients in Germany: short and long-term results of a large 10-year population-based cohort

Valentin Schnitzbauer et al.

SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2020)

Article Surgery

Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Hospital Type Drives Utilization and Outcomes

Anthony M. Villano et al.

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH (2020)

Article Surgery

Is robotic right colectomy economically sustainable? a multicentre retrospective comparative study and cost analysis

Giovanni Merola et al.

SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2020)

Article Surgery

Superior pathologic and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive rectal cancer resection, compared to open resection

Grace C. Lee et al.

SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2020)

Review Oncology

Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Xiaowei Wang et al.

JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS (2020)

Review Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Completeness of total mesorectum excision of laparoscopic versus robotic surgery: a review with a meta-analysis

Marco Milone et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE (2019)

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

A propensity-score-matched analysis of laparoscopic vs open surgery for rectal cancer in a population-based study

P. Manchon-Walsh et al.

COLORECTAL DISEASE (2019)

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

The robotic approach significantly reduces length of stay after colectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis

Ahmed M. Al-Mazrou et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE (2017)

Article Surgery

Robotic proctectomy for rectal cancer: analysis of 71 patients from a single institution

Philip M. Spanheimer et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY (2017)

Review Surgery

Robotic approaches may offer benefit in colorectal procedures, more controversial in other areas: a review of 168,248 cases

Maria S. Altieri et al.

SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2016)

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Totally robotic rectal resection: an experience of the first 100 consecutive cases

J. Ahmed et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE (2016)

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Oncologic and Clinicopathologic Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer

Ajit Pai et al.

DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM (2015)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection on Pathological Outcomes in Rectal Cancer The ALaCaRT Randomized Clinical Trial

Andrew R. L. Stevenson et al.

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2015)

Article Oncology

Robotic Rectal Cancer Resection: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis

Minia Hellan et al.

ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY (2015)

Article Surgery

Robotic surgery for rectal cancer can overcome difficulties associated with pelvic anatomy

Se Jin Baek et al.

SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2015)

Meeting Abstract Gastroenterology & Hepatology

APOLIPOPROTEIN A2 IS ASSOCIATED WITH RESISTANCE TO CHEMORADIATION AND METASTATIC DISEASE IN COLORECTAL CANCER.

G. Gantt et al.

DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM (2014)

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Robotic vs Laparoscopic Resection of Rectal Cancer: Short-Term Outcomes of a Case-Control Study

Jung Myun Kwak et al.

DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM (2011)