4.7 Article

Overall Accuracy of Radiological Digital Planning for Total Hip Arthroplasty in a Specialized Orthopaedics Hospital

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 13, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134503

Keywords

total hip arthroplasty; digital planning; digital templating; radiological planning; radiology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Preoperative radiological planning is crucial for predicting implant size and positioning in total hip arthroplasty. Our study evaluated the accuracy of digital templating in 215 patients and found that our method was highly effective, with accurate predictions in 95.8% of cases for the stem and 94.9% for the cup in anteroposterior view only, and even more accurate results in lateral view. Exact prediction rates for stem size and stem neck length were 77.7% and 75.35%, respectively.
Preoperative radiological planning is a key factor in the prediction of implant size and positioning that influences surgical time, the risk of complications, and functional outcomes. We have tested the accuracy of the digital templating performed in our hospital for a sample of 215 patients that underwent total hip arthroplasty. We assessed the accuracy of correctly predicting implant size for the femoral and acetabular components, as well as the stem neck length. We found that our method of templating proved accurate (within one size) in 95.8% of cases for the stem and 94.9% for the cup when using the anteroposterior view only, while the lateral view was accurate in 95.8% of cases for the stem and 97.2% for the cup. Exact prediction of the stem size was obtained in 77.7% of cases using the anteroposterior view and 67.0% of cases on the lateral view, and 73.0% and 74.4% of cases for the cup on the AP and LL views, respectively. Stem neck size was predicted exactly in 75.35% of cases and within one size in 93.49% of cases. We concluded that our method of digital templating using dedicated software is highly effective in accurately predicting implant size.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available