4.7 Review

Benefits and Challenges of Treat-to-Target in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 19, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12196292

Keywords

inflammatory bowel disease; treat to target; ulcerative colitis; crohn's disease; endoscopy; mucosal healing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is a significant difference between symptomatology and disease activity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and treatment based solely on symptoms may not change the course of the disease significantly. The Selecting Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (STRIDE) initiative published the STRIDE-II position statement in 2021, which provides the most recent recommendations for a treat-to-target (T2T) approach in IBD. However, there are limitations and challenges to implementing the T2T approach in real-world clinical practice, including a lack of standardized definition for mucosal healing (MH) and limited evidence of achieving MH with a T2T approach.
There is notable disparity between symptomatology and disease activity in a significant proportion of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and escalation of treatment based on symptoms alone can fail to significantly alter the course of disease. The STRIDE-II position statement, published in 2021 by the Selecting Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (STRIDE) initiative of the International Organisation for the Study of IBD (IOIBD) provides the most current recommendations for a treat-to-target (T2T) approach in IBD. Despite the benefits offered by a T2T approach in IBD, there are numerous drawbacks and current limitations to its widespread implementation in real-world clinical practice. Owing to the lack of a standardised definition of MH, outcome data are heterogeneous and limit the comparability of existing data. Further, studies investigating the likelihood of achieving MH with a T2T approach are limited and largely retrospective. Evidence of the real-world feasibility of tight monitoring is currently minimal and demonstrates sub-optimal adherence among patients. Further, the few studies on the acceptability and uptake of a T2T approach in real-world practice demonstrate the need for increased acceptability on both patients' and clinicians' behalf. Real-world applicability is further limited by the need for repeated endoscopic assessments of MH as well as a lack of guidance on how to incorporate the various treatment targets into therapeutic decision-making. We aim to review the benefits and challenges of the T2T approach and to discuss potential solutions to further patient care.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available