4.7 Review

The Management of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: An Ongoing Challenge

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 17, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12175530

Keywords

ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm; open surgical repair; endovascular repair; high-volume center; preoperative scores

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite improvements in diagnosis and treatment, ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAAs) still cause a significant number of deaths. This study aims to provide an overview of the contemporary management of RAAA patients, focusing on preoperative and intraoperative factors that could aid in decision-making for surgeons. The importance of the English summary: 8 points.
Background: despite improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of elective AAAs, ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAAs) continue to cause a substantial number of deaths. The choice between an open or endovascular approach remains a challenge, as does postoperative complications in survivors. The aim of this manuscript is to offer an overview of the contemporary management of RAAA patients, with a focus on preoperative and intraoperative factors that could help surgeons provide more appropriate treatment. Methods: we performed a search on MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus from 1 January 1985 to 1 May 2023 and reviewed SVS and ESVS guidelines. A total of 278 articles were screened, but only those with data available on ruptured aneurysms' incidence and prevalence, preoperative scores, and mortality rates after emergency endovascular or open repair for ruptured AAA were included in the narrative synthesis. Articles were not restricted due to the designs of the studies. Results: the centralization of RAAAs has improved outcomes after both surgical and endovascular repair. Preoperative mortality risk scores and knowledge of intraoperative factors influencing mortality could help surgeons with decision-making, although there is still no consensus about the best treatment. Complications continue to be an issue in patients surviving intervention. Conclusions: RAAA still represents a life-threatening condition, with high mortality rates. Effective screening and centralization matched with adequate preoperative risk-benefit assessment may improve outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available