4.7 Article

Real-Time Estimation of Anaerobic Threshold during Exercise Using Electrocardiogram in Heart Failure Patients

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12165225

Keywords

heart rate variability; ventilatory threshold; cardiopulmonary exercise testing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to validate a method for estimating anaerobic threshold (AT) using heart rate variability (HRV) analysis from electrocardiography data in patients with heart failure. The study found a correlation between the HRV threshold and the VO2 at AT, suggesting that HRV may be a useful indicator for estimating AT in patients with heart failure.
Exercise therapy at the aerobic level is highly recommended to improve clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure, in which cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) is required to determine anaerobic thresholds (ATs) but is not available everywhere. This study aimed to validate a method to estimate the AT using heart rate variability (HRV) analysis from electrocardiography data in patients with heart failure. Between 2014 and 2019, 67 patients with symptomatic heart failure underwent CPXs in a single university hospital. During the CPX, RR intervals was measured continuously and the HRV threshold (HRVT), defined as the inflection point of <5 ms(2) of a high-frequency component (HFC) using the power spectrum analysis, was determined. Patients were divided into two groups according to the mean HFC at rest (high-HFC group, n = 34 and low-HFC group, n = 33). The high-HFC group showed good correlation between the VO2 at AT and HRVT (r = 0.63, p < 0.001) and strong agreement (mean difference, -0.38 mL/kg, p = 0.571). The low-HFC group also showed modest correlation (r = 0.41, p = 0.017) but poor agreement (mean differences, 3.75 mL/kg, p < 0.001). In conclusion, the HRVT obtained from electrocardiography may be a useful indicator for estimating AT in patients with heart failure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available