4.8 Article

Design of refractory multi-principal-element alloys for high-temperature applications

Journal

NPJ COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41524-023-01095-4

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By using density-functional theory methods and rapid bulk alloy synthesis and characterization, the researchers discovered Mo72.3W12.8Ta10.0Ti2.5Zr2.5 alloy, which has a well-balanced combination of room-temperature and high-temperature mechanical properties. This alloy exhibits comparable high-temperature compressive strength to MoNbTaW but with improved ductility and creep resistance. It also outperforms a commercial Mo-based refractory alloy and a nickel-based superalloy (Haynes-282) in terms of high-temperature tensile strength and creep resistance.
Refractory multi-principal-element alloys (RMPEAs) exhibit high specific strength at elevated temperatures (T). However, current RMPEAs lack a balance of room-temperature (RT) ductility, high -T strength, and high -T creep resistance. Using density-functional theory methods, we scanned composition space using four criteria: (1) formation energies for operational stability: -150 < E-f = +70 meV per atom; (2) higher strength found via interstitial electron density with Young's moduli E > 250 GPa; (3) inverse Pugh ratio for ductility: G/B < 0.57; and (4) high melting points: T-m > 2500 degrees C. Using rapid bulk alloy synthesis and characterization, we validated theory and down-selected promising alloy compositions and discovered Mo72.3W12.8Ta10.0Ti2.5Zr2.5 having well-balanced RT and high -T mechanical properties. This alloy has comparable high -T compressive strength to well-known MoNbTaW but is more ductile and more creep resistant. It is also superior to a commercial Mo-based refractory alloy and a nickel based superalloy (Haynes-282) with improved high -T tensile strength and creep resistance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available