4.8 Article

Potent pan huACE2-dependent sarbecovirus neutralizing monoclonal antibodies isolated from a BNT162b2-vaccinated SARS survivor

Journal

SCIENCE ADVANCES
Volume 9, Issue 30, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.ade3470

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article reports the isolation and characterization of highly potent monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the receptor binding domain (RBD) of huACE2-dependent sarbecoviruses from a SARS-CoV survivor vaccinated with BNT162b2. Among the six mAbs identified, one (E7) showed superior neutralizing potency and breadth against huACE2-dependent sarbecoviruses compared to any other mAbs reported to date. Mutagenesis and cryo-electron microscopy studies revealed a unique RBD contact footprint for these mAbs, with E7 binding to a quaternary structure-dependent epitope.
The emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants of concern such as Omicron hampered efforts in controlling the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic due to their ability to escape neutralizing antibodies induced by vaccination or prior infection, highlighting the need to develop broad-spectrum vaccines and therapeutics. Most human monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) reported to date have not demonstrated true pan-sarbecovirus neutralizing breadth especially against animal sarbecoviruses. Here, we report the isolation and characterization of highly potent mAbs targeting the receptor binding domain (RBD) of huACE2-dependent sarbecovirus from a SARS-CoV survivor vaccinated with BNT162b2. Among the six mAbs identified, one (E7) showed better huACE2-dependent sarbecovirus neutralizing potency and breadth than any other mAbs reported to date. Mutagenesis and cryo-electron microscopy studies indicate that these mAbs have a unique RBD contact footprint and that E7 binds to a quaternary structure-dependent epitope.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available