4.5 Review

Pediatric heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, a review

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1137853

Keywords

heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; diastolic heart failure; pediatric; child; cardiomyopathy; pulmonary hypertension

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Diastolic dysfunction refers to an abnormality of the left ventricle that impairs heart filling. HFpEF, which accounts for a large proportion of acute heart failure hospitalizations in adults, is poorly recognized and understood in children. The diagnosis of diastolic dysfunction in children is challenging and the underlying causes differ from those in adults. This review focuses on the causes, prognostic factors, and diagnosis difficulties of HFpEF in children, providing a simplified diagnostic algorithm.
Diastolic dysfunction refers to a structural or functional abnormality of the left ventricle, resulting in impaired filling of the heart. Severe diastolic dysfunction can lead to congestive heart failure even when the left ventricle systolic function is normal. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for nearly half of the hospitalizations for acute heart failure in the adult population but the clinical recognition and understanding of HFpEF in children is poor. The condition is certainly much less frequent than in the adult population but the confirmatory diagnosis of diastolic dysfunction in children is also challenging. The underlying causes of HFpEF in children are diverse and differ from the main cause in adults. This review addresses the underlying causes and prognostic factors of HFpEF in children. We describe the pulmonary hypertension profiles associated with this cardiac condition. We discuss diagnosis difficulties in clinical practice, and we provide a simplified diagnostic algorithm for HFpEF in children.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available