4.6 Article

Taxing reproduction: the full transfer cost of rearing children in Europe

Journal

ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.230759

Keywords

national transfer accounts; valuing care; societal reproduction; unpaid household labour; intergenerational transfers; social policy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the intergenerational resource transfer contributions of parents and non-parents in Europe based on National Transfer Accounts and National Time Transfer Accounts for 12 countries around 2010. The research reveals that non-parents contribute mainly to public transfers, while parents provide larger private transfers in the form of market goods and unpaid household labor. Considering all three transfers, the parental/non-parental contribution ratio in Europe increases from 0.73 (public transfers alone) to 2.66. The highest contribution ratios are found in Sweden and Finland.
What are the intergenerational resource transfer contributions of parents and non-parents in Europe? Using National Transfer Accounts and National Time Transfer Accounts for 12 countries around 2010, we go beyond public transfers (net taxes) to also value two statistically much less visible transfers in the family realm: of market goods and of unpaid household labour (time). Non-parents contribute almost exclusively to public transfers. But parents additionally provide still larger private transfers: mothers mainly time, fathers mainly market goods. Estimating transfer stocks over the working life, the average parental/non-parental contribution ratio in Europe flips from 0.73 (public transfers alone) to 2.66 (all three transfers combined). The highest combined parental/non-parental contribution ratios are in Sweden and Finland. The metaphorical tax rates implicitly imposed thereby on rearing children in Europe are multiples of the value-added tax rates in place on consumption goods. Unveiling the sheer magnitude of these invisible transfer asymmetries carries multiple implications for policy debates. For instance, it raises the question whether ageing European societies unwittingly tax, rather than subsidise, their own reproduction. Family friendly policy models, such as the Nordic welfare states, do not mitigate this effect. They help parents work, but do not lower the implicit tax parents pay.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available