4.7 Article

Model for the hardness-depth relationships of ion-irradiated nanocrystalline metals

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-JMR&T
Volume 27, Issue -, Pages 2847-2855

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.10.101

Keywords

Nanocrystalline metals; Ion irradiation; Hardness model; Grain boundary effect

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work proposes a mechanistic model to characterize the evolution of hardness in ion-irradiated nanocrystalline metals as a function of indentation depth. The model considers the contribution of grain interiors and grain boundaries to hardening, and validates the rationality and accuracy of the proposed model through comparison with experimental data.
In this work, a mechanistic model is proposed for ion-irradiated nanocrystalline (NC) metals to characterize the evolution of hardness as a function of the indentation depth at room temperature and under quasi-static loading condition. At the grain level, grain interiors (GIs) and grain boundaries (GBs)-dominated hardening are addressed simultaneously in the developed model, which is able to effectively characterize the contribution of geometrically necessary dislocations (GNDs), statistically stored dislocations (SSDs), irradiation-induced defects, Hall-Petch effect and the intrinsic strength of GBs. Thereinto, the GIs-dominated hardening mechanisms are systematically analyzed by considering the evolution of microstructures, which include the average density of dislocations and irradiation-induced defects within the plastic zone, and are noticed to be affected by the high ratio of GBs. Main attentions are focused on the description of GBs influence that covers dislocation hardening and defect hardening. The rationality and accuracy of the proposed model are validated by comparing the theoretical results with corresponding experimental data under different irradiation conditions. The proposed model offers a promising way to analyze the irradiation hardening mechanisms of NC metals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available