4.7 Article

Influence of carbon fiber failure mode caused by TiO2 coating on the high temperature tensile strength of carbon fiber reinforced 7075 Al alloy composites

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-JMR&T
Volume 26, Issue -, Pages 4551-4562

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.08.191

Keywords

Metal-matrix composites (MMCs); TiO2 coating; High temperature tensile strength; Carbon fiber failure mode

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By coating carbon fiber with TiO2, the mechanical properties of carbon fiber reinforced 7075 Al alloy material were enhanced at high temperature conditions. The tensile strength and strength/density ratio of the composite were found to increase after TiO2 coating, attributed to the transformation of carbon fiber failure mode.
To enhance the mechanical properties of carbon fiber (CF) reinforced 7075 Al alloy material at high temperature conditions, TiO2 coating was prepared on the surface of CF by chemical vapor deposition. The composites were prepared by hot pressing sintering and hot extrusion methods. The evolution of the compositional components of the composite interface was investigated. The density, hardness, and tensile strength of the samples were measured, and the strength/density ratio of the samples was calculated at 150 degrees C. The results indicate that the tensile strength of coated CF reinforced composite (535 MPa) was increased by 21.3% and 5.7% compared to the tensile strength of 7075 Al alloy (441 MPa) and uncoated CF reinforced composite (506 MPa), respectively. Furthermore, the strength/ density ratio of the composite also increased with the addition of TiO2 coating. The enhancement of coating on CF on tensile strength is attributed to the transformation of CF failure mode.(c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available