4.5 Article

Magnetospheric Time History in Storm-Time Magnetic Flux Dynamics

Journal

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2023JA031832

Keywords

interplanetary coronal mass ejection; magnetic flux; geomagnetic storm; space weather; storm sudden commencement; magnetospheric current systems

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Magnetospheric magnetic flux dynamics in 29 geomagnetic storms between 2015 and 2019 were quantified using near-equatorial Van Allen Probe, GOES, and Magnetospheric Multiscale satellites. Concurrent, multi-probe observations were utilized for the first time to preserve magnetospheric time history. It was revealed that during storm sudden commencement (SSC), magnetic flux uniformly increased by 15% throughout the magnetosphere, except for a 30% decrease in the nightside inner magnetosphere, and during the storm main and recovery phases, there was a decrease of 30% and 15% respectively in the nightside magnetosphere.
Magnetospheric magnetic flux dynamics is quantified in 29 geomagnetic storms between 2015 and 2019, using near-equatorial Van Allen Probe, GOES, and Magnetospheric Multiscale satellites. For the first time, concurrent, multi-probe observations are utilized to preserve magnetospheric time history, defined as the state of the magnetosphere leading up to an observation. It is revealed that, relative to pre-storm conditions, (a) during the storm sudden commencement (SSC), magnetic flux uniformly increases ?? = +15% throughout the magnetosphere, except in the nightside inner magnetosphere where ?? = -30%, and (b) during storm main and recovery phases, ?? = -30% and -15%, respectively, in the nightside magnetosphere, at radial distances 5 = r [R-E] < 8. It is found that a symmetric ring current is likely formed in the nightside, early in the storm process (localized during SSC), which then broadens during the main phase, before weakening during the recovery phase. The current system on the dayside shows a distinct dawn-dusk asymmetry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available