4.7 Article Data Paper

Spatial-temporal distribution of global production-living-ecological space during the period 2000-2020

Journal

SCIENTIFIC DATA
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41597-023-02497-1

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper generates a dataset of global production-living-ecological space by combining global land cover data from GlobeLand30 and population density data from NASA's Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center. The dataset is validated with the random sampling function of ArcGIS software, achieving an overall accuracy of 83.94% and a Kappa coefficient of 0.81 for the year 2020, 87.00% and 0.84 for 2010, and 86.06% and 0.83 for 2000. This dataset fills a gap in the global production-living-ecology space database and serves as an essential reference for assessing the coordinated development of sustainable development goals.
Global production-living-ecology space closely corresponds with sustainable development's economic, social and ecological elements. The dataset of global production-living-ecological space in this paper was generated by combining the global land cover obtained using GlobeLand30 and the population density supplied by NASA's Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center in 2000, 2010, and 2020. The verification was carried out using the random sampling function of ArcGIS software on the basis of Google Earth sample images. The overall accuracy of the global production-living-ecological space data in 2020 was 83.94% and the Kappa coefficient was 0.81. The overall accuracy of the global production-living-ecological space data in 2010 was 87.00% and the Kappa coefficient was 0.84. The overall accuracy of the spatial data in 2000 was 86.06% and the Kappa coefficient was 0.83. The dataset fills a gap in the global production-living-ecology space database and will be an essential reference for assessing the coordinated development of sustainable development goals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available