4.7 Article Data Paper

Anthropogenic pollen indicators: Global food plants and Latin American human indicators in the pollen record

Journal

SCIENTIFIC DATA
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41597-023-02613-1

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pollen-based evidence is crucial for understanding human history, but the information is scattered in the literature, which may lead to the overlooking of important evidence. In this study, a comprehensive overview of major food plants worldwide was compiled, and human indicators from pollen-based paleoecological literature in Latin America were also summarized. This study provides valuable datasets for extracting human evidence from fossil pollen records.
Pollen-based evidence of human presence is crucial for reconstructing human history. However, information on the morphology of pollen grains of global food plants and regional pollen-based human indicators is scattered in the literature, leading to the risk of overlooking important evidence of human presence. To address this issue, we first compiled a comprehensive overview of 354 major food plants worldwide, creating a paleoecology-friendly format that includes their family, vernacular name, earliest known use, environmental preference, and geographical region. Moreover, we identified the sources of illustrations of their pollen grains for 209 out of 273 different genera of globally relevant food plants in 10 selected pollen atlases. Secondly, we compiled all human indicators from pollen-based paleoecological literature in Latin America (based on 750 references), providing an overview of 212 single-pollen type indicators and identified 95 crucial combinations of pollen types as human indices, and their corresponding references. Our review datasets aids in distilling human evidence from numerous fossil pollen records worldwide.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available