4.8 Article

CrossTrack: Device-Free Cross-Link Tracking With Commodity Wi-Fi

Journal

IEEE INTERNET OF THINGS JOURNAL
Volume 10, Issue 20, Pages 18028-18041

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JIOT.2023.3278286

Keywords

Channel state information (CSI); commodity Wi-Fi; device-free tracking

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article introduces CrossTrack, a device-free cross-link tracking system that utilizes commodity Wi-Fi. By detecting cross-link behavior, identifying cross-link position, and optimizing trajectory, CrossTrack reduces tracking errors significantly.
Device-free Wi-Fi tracking has become essential for ubiquitous wireless sensing. However, current device-free Wi-Fi tracking systems suffer from two limitations: First, abnormal signals interfere with tracking performance when the user walks across the direct link of the transceivers and second, the tracking error based on the velocity integral accumulates over time. This article proposes CrossTrack, the first device-free cross-link tracking system with commodity Wi-Fi. Our inspiration is to regard the cross-link behavior as an opportunity to correct the trajectory instead of disturbing noise like previous work. Our approach involves three main steps. First, we devise a metric that is capable of detecting cross-link behavior. Second, we propose a new theoretical model that identifies the cross-link position as a landmark. Third, we develop a path revision technique that utilizes this landmark to optimize the trajectory. The technique innovation of this article is to reveal the theoretical approach to transform cross-link interference into optimization in device-free tracking for the first time. We implement CrossTrack based on commercial Wi-Fi devices and conduct comprehensive experiments. Our results show that CrossTrack can reduce tracking errors by 48.75%, and the median tracking error is 0.41 m.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available