4.7 Article

Quantum advantages for transportation tasks-projectiles, rockets and quantum backflow

Journal

NPJ QUANTUM INFORMATION
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41534-023-00739-z

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Consideration is given to the scenario in which a quantum particle is initially placed within a finite region and allowed to propagate freely. It is discovered that there are 'ultrafast' ('ultraslow') quantum states where the probability of arrival is higher (lower) than that of any classical particle prepared in the same region with the same momentum distribution. The quantum advantage for both projectiles and rockets is limited by the Bracken-Melloy constant c(bm), previously used to study quantum backflow, and it is proven that the conjecture c(bm)≥0.038 made 29 years ago is substantiated by the bounds 0.0315≤c(bm)≤0.072. Furthermore, in a modified projectile scenario with a fixed initial position distribution, the quantum advantage can reach 0.1262.
Consider a scenario where a quantum particle is initially prepared in some bounded region of space and left to propagate freely. After some time, we verify if the particle has reached some distant target region. We find that there exist 'ultrafast' ('ultraslow') quantum states, whose probability of arrival is greater (smaller) than that of any classical particle prepared in the same region with the same momentum distribution. For both projectiles and rockets, we prove that the quantum advantage, quantified by the difference between the quantum and optimal classical arrival probabilities, is limited by the Bracken-Melloy constant c(bm), originally introduced to study the phenomenon of quantum backflow. In this regard, we substantiate the 29-year-old conjecture that c(bm) & AP; 0.038 by proving the bounds 0.0315 & LE; c(bm) & LE; 0.072. Finally, we show that, in a modified projectile scenario where the initial position distribution of the particle is also fixed, the quantum advantage can reach 0.1262.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available