4.4 Article

Biomechanical Comparison of Different Surgical Approaches for the Treatment of Adjacent Segment Diseases after Primary Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology

Effects of Revision Rod Position on Spinal Construct Stability in Lumbar Revision Surgery: A Finite Element Study

Quan-Chang Tan et al.

Summary: Revision surgery is a necessary intervention to treat complications related to spinal instrumentation. This study investigated the influence of the position of the revision rod on the biomechanics of the revision construct. The results indicated that the position of the revision rod had a minimal impact on the construct and that the method of constructing spinal instrumentation played a more significant role in influencing the biomechanics of revision.

FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY (2022)

Article Clinical Neurology

Minimally Invasive Transforaminal versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients Undergoing Revision Fusion: Clinical Outcome Comparison

James W. Nie et al.

Summary: This study compared the perioperative/postoperative clinical outcomes between minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) and anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) in patients undergoing revision surgery. The results showed that patients undergoing either MIS-TLIF or ALIF had similar 1-year postoperative outcomes in terms of physical function, mental health, disability, and back/leg pain. However, patients undergoing revision MIS-TLIF reported improved physical function at 12 weeks and 6 months.

WORLD NEUROSURGERY (2022)

Article Clinical Neurology

Indirect Decompression Using Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Revision Surgery Following Previous Posterior Decompression: Comparison of Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes Between Direct and Indirect Decompression Revision Surgery

Sang-Jin Park et al.

Summary: This study compared the outcomes of direct and indirect lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery. The results showed that although oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) was inferior to transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in some measures, there was no difference between the two surgeries in terms of clinical outcomes. However, OLIF was considered a safer and effective minimally invasive surgery due to its ability to avoid complications associated with the posterior approach.

NEUROSPINE (2022)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Long-Term Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: 10-Year Follow-up Results

Young-Ho Roh et al.

Summary: MI-TLIF provides significant improvements in clinical and radiological outcomes, but up to 50% of patients develop R-ASDeg within 10 years after surgery. Patients with R-ASDeg experience worse leg pain and ODI.

JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE (2022)

Article Biology

Biomechanical comparison of four types of instrumentation constructs for revision surgery in lumbar adjacent segment disease: A finite element study

Quan-chang Tan et al.

Summary: By constructing and validating a finite element model, this study compared the biomechanical properties of four different constructs in revision surgery. The results showed that the biomechanics of implant-preserving constructs were comparable to the traditional implant-replacing construct.

COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE (2021)

Article Clinical Neurology

Clinical outcomes in revision lumbar spine fusions: an observational cohort study

Thiago S. Montenegro et al.

JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE (2020)

Review Orthopedics

An Approach to Lumbar Revision Spine Surgery in Adults

S. Samuel Bederman et al.

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS (2016)