4.6 Review

Economic and social values in the brain: evidence from lesions to the human ventromedial prefrontal cortex

Journal

FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1198262

Keywords

reward value; social value; ventromedial prefrontal cortex; orbitofrontal cortex; lesion studies; decision-making

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Damage to the vmPFC is associated with personality changes and impairments in decision-making. The vmPFC may play a unified role in guiding decisions in both social and non-social domains, but the exact mechanism is unclear. Assessing the effects of vmPFC damage in patients can help determine its causal role in shaping economic and social behavior.
Making good economic and social decisions is essential for individual and social welfare. Decades of research have provided compelling evidence that damage to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) is associated with dramatic personality changes and impairments in economic and social decision-making. However, whether the vmPFC subserves a unified mechanism in the social and non-social domains remains unclear. When choosing between economic options, the vmPFC is thought to guide decision by encoding value signals that reflect the motivational relevance of the options on a common scale. A recent framework, the extended common neural currency hypothesis, suggests that the vmPFC may also assign values to social factors and principles, thereby guiding social decision-making. Although neural value signals have been observed in the vmPFC in both social and non-social studies, it is yet to be determined whether they have a causal influence on behavior or merely correlate with decision-making. In this review, we assess whether lesion studies of patients with vmPFC damage offer evidence for such a causal role of the vmPFC in shaping economic and social behavior.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available