4.8 Review

Risk factors for multiple sclerosis in the context of Epstein-Barr virus infection

Journal

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1212676

Keywords

multiple sclerosis; Epstein-Barr virus; infectious mononucleosis; human leukocyte antigen; vitamin D; sun exposure; smoking; obesity

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is compelling evidence that Epstein Barr virus (EBV) infection is a prerequisite for multiple sclerosis (MS). The disease is believed to result from a complex interplay between latent EBV infection, genetic predisposition, and various environmental and lifestyle factors that impact immune control of the infection. Evidence of gene-environment interactions and triggered epigenetic modifications in genetically susceptible individuals support this relationship. This review provides an overview of EBV, host immunity, and the evidence linking EBV as a prerequisite for MS. It also discusses the role of genetic and environmental risk factors, their interactions, and potential preventive measures based on the findings presented.
Compelling evidence indicates that Epstein Barr virus (EBV) infection is a prerequisite for multiple sclerosis (MS). The disease may arise from a complex interplay between latent EBV infection, genetic predisposition, and various environmental and lifestyle factors that negatively affect immune control of the infection. Evidence of gene-environment interactions and epigenetic modifications triggered by environmental factors in genetically susceptible individuals supports this view. This review gives a short introduction to EBV and host immunity and discusses evidence indicating EBV as a prerequisite for MS. The role of genetic and environmental risk factors, and their interactions, in MS pathogenesis is reviewed and put in the context of EBV infection. Finally, possible preventive measures are discussed based on the findings presented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available