Journal
CHEMICAL GEOLOGY
Volume 410, Issue -, Pages 28-39Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2015.05.021
Keywords
Selenium isotopes; Permian-Triassic mass extinction; Productivity; Redox
Categories
Funding
- National Science Foundation [EAR-0921580]
- NAI Virtual Planetary Laboratory at the University of Washington
- University of Washington Royalty Research Fund grant
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The causes of the greatest mass extinction in Earth's history, in the latest Permian, remain actively debated. Here we use Se isotopes and abundances in marine sediments froman outer-shelf environment to test one of the most common hypotheses for the collapse of the biosphere, i.e. widespread euxinia in the open ocean. Our data show a small positive excursion in delta Se-82/78 prior to the extinction, consistent with local euxinia. However, this is followed by a significant negative excursion with a minimum of -1.8 parts per thousand (relative to NIST SRM3149), immediately preceding the principal extinction horizon. A net fractionation of this magnitude likely resulted from partial reduction of Se oxyanions dissolved in the water column. Due to their low abundance, Se oxyanions are rapidly scavenged in anoxic basins or regions of high biological productivity with little net isotopic fractionation. We therefore interpret the uniquely negative fractionations in this section as an indicator for relatively oxygenated conditions in this marine basin at the time when biological productivity declined. The offset between the peak excursion and the major extinction horizon possibly reflects a slow-down in ocean circulation leading to nutrient limitation, which may thus have prohibited a rapid recovery of the local biosphere in the early Triassic. Although we are unable to extrapolate to the global ocean due to the short residence time of Se in seawater, our data are consistent with the newly emerging view that euxinia developed along ocean margins and in oxygen minimum zones before the extinction, but was probably replaced by (sub-) oxic conditions during the similar to 1 kyr peak productivity decline and was thus not solely responsible for the extinction event. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available