4.2 Article

A Novel TSH Receptor Gene Variant Associated With Non-Autoimmune Hyperthyrotropinemia: A Case Report

Publisher

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1871530323666230824153915

Keywords

Non-autoimmune hyperthyrotropinemia; novel tsh receptor gene mutation; tsh receptor; thyroid; hyperthyrotropinemia; familial hyperthyrotropinemia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this case report, we present a novel loss-of-function gene mutation in the TSH receptor gene associated with a TSH resistance phenotype.
Background: Resistance to TSH is defined as reduced sensitivity to normal, biologically-active TSH, and abnormally high levels of TSH are needed to achieve normal levels of thyroid hormones.Case Presentation: A 15-year-old female patient, having been treated since childhood with levothyroxine for hyperthyrotropinemia was referred to our institution complaining of tachycardia after the levothyroxine therapy had been increased. Thyroid ultrasound features were normal, and thyroid antibodies were negative. The therapy was gradually tapered in light of the symptoms, although subclinical hypothyroidism was evident at thyroid function tests. First-degree relatives were tested for thyroid function, and the father was also found to have a previously-unknown subclinical hypothyroidism. The patient underwent genetic testing for TSH receptor (TSHR) gene mutations, which revealed a gene variant hitherto not described: p.C598R (c.1792T>C). The father was also tested and was found to carry the same mutation, while other first-degree relatives were wild-type for the TSHR gene. An in-silico analysis was performed, which revealed a loss-of-function phenotype corresponding to the described variant, suggesting a novel loss-of-function TSH receptor gene mutation.Conclusion: In this case report, we present a novel loss-of-function gene mutation in the TSH receptor gene associated with a TSH resistance phenotype.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available