4.3 Article

Sensitivity of an AI method for [18F]FDG PET/CT outcome prediction of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients to image reconstruction protocols

Journal

EJNMMI RESEARCH
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1186/s13550-023-01036-8

Keywords

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; PET; Convolutional neural networks; Reconstruction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the robustness of CNN predictions to different image reconstruction protocols in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The results show that CNN probabilities are sensitive to reconstruction protocols, but image-based harmonization can improve the consistency of predictions.
Background Convolutional neural networks (CNNs), applied to baseline [F-18]-FDG PET/CT maximum intensity projections (MIPs), show potential for treatment outcome prediction in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The aim of this study is to investigate the robustness of CNN predictions to different image reconstruction protocols. Baseline [F-18]FDG PET/CT scans were collected from 20 DLBCL patients. EARL1, EARL2 and high-resolution (HR) protocols were applied per scan, generating three images with different image qualities. Image-based transformation was applied by blurring EARL2 and HR images to generate EARL1 compliant images using a Gaussian filter of 5 and 7 mm, respectively. MIPs were generated for each of the reconstructions, before and after image transformation. An in-house developed CNN predicted the probability of tumor progression within 2 years for each MIP. The difference in probabilities per patient was then calculated between both EARL2 and HR with respect to EARL1 (delta probabilities or Delta P). We compared these to the probabilities obtained after aligning the data with ComBat using the difference in median and interquartile range (IQR). Results CNN probabilities were found to be sensitive to different reconstruction protocols (EARL2 Delta P: median = 0.09, interquartile range (IQR) = [0.06, 0.10] and HR Delta P: median = 0.1, IQR = [0.08, 0.16]). Moreover, higher resolution images (EARL2 and HR) led to higher probability values. After image-based and ComBat transformation, an improved agreement of CNN probabilities among reconstructions was found for all patients. This agreement was slightly better after image-based transformation (transformed EARL2 Delta P: median = 0.022, IQR = [0.01, 0.02] and transformed HR Delta P: median = 0.029, IQR = [0.01, 0.03]). Conclusion Our CNN-based outcome predictions are affected by the applied reconstruction protocols, yet in a predictable manner. Image-based harmonization is a suitable approach to harmonize CNN predictions across image reconstruction protocols.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available