4.6 Article

Slope stability analysis using artificial intelligence techniques

Journal

NATURAL HAZARDS
Volume 84, Issue 2, Pages 727-748

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-016-2454-2

Keywords

Slope stability; Factor of safety; Artificial intelligence; Multigene genetic programming; Multivariate adaptive regression splines; Functional network

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Natural and man-made soil slope failures are complex phenomena and cause serious hazards in many countries of the world. As a result, public and private property is damaged worth millions of dollars. It is necessary to understand the processes causing failure of slopes and prediction of its vulnerability for proper mitigation of slope failure hazards. Various attempts have been made to predict the stability of slope using both conventional methods such as limit equilibrium method, finite element method, finite difference method and statistical methods. Artificial intelligence (AI) methods like artificial neural networks, genetic programming and genetic algorithms, and support vector machines are found to have better efficiency compared to statistical methods. The present study is an attempt to use recently developed AI methods such as functional networks (FNs), multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), and multigene genetic programming (MGGP) to predict factor of safety of slope using slope stability data available in the literature. Prediction model equations are also provided, which can be used to predict the factor of safety of a slope. The performances of these AI techniques have been evaluated in terms of different statistical parameters such as average absolute error, maximum absolute error, root mean square error, correlation coefficient, and Nash-Sutcliff coefficient of efficiency. Of the available models, MARS model had better prediction performance in comparison with MGGP and FN models in terms of the above statistical criteria.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available