4.4 Article

Robotic animal-assisted therapy as a complementary therapy in clinical practice: Exploring animal-assisted intervention professional perspectives

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2023.101767

Keywords

Animal-assisted interventions; Animal-assisted therapy; Developmental disabilities; Robotic animal-assisted therapy; Occupational therapy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to gain insight into the perspectives of therapists who incorporate Animal-Assisted Therapy (AAT) into their programs and explore benefits and ethical considerations. The results indicate that most participants have not used Robotic Animal-Assisted Therapy (RAAT), but many see it as an alternative or preparatory intervention when live animal interaction is not possible. The data further contributes to an emerging field.
Background: and Purpose: Animal-Assisted Therapy (AAT) is a therapy that incorporates animals to improve the motor, social, behavioral, and/or cognitive functioning of participants. AAT has been shown to be a beneficial intervention for a wide range of populations. Although, researchers have suggested concerns in implementing AAT. The purpose of this study is to gain insight into the perspectives of therapists who incorporate AAT into their programs and to explore benefits and ethical considerations within the field of AAT. This study also aims to seek possible implications for robotic animal-assisted therapy (RAAT).Materials and methods: Professionals from the Association of Animal-Assisted Intervention Professionals (AAAIP) were recruited, along with members from multiple AAT private and public Facebook groups. Participants completed an anonymous online semi-structured survey, exploring their experience with and perspectives on both AAT and RAAT. Fourteen participants' responses were analyzed using Dedoose software to identify common themes in the responses.Results: The results of this study provide various perspectives from professionals in different settings on the benefits of AAT, concerns about AAT, and the implication for the utilization of RAAT. The data indicated that most of the participants have not incorporated RAAT into practice. However, many of the participants believed that RAAT can be an alternative or preparatory intervention when interaction with live animals is not possible. The data collected further contributes to an emerging niche setting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available