Journal
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 13, Issue 16, Pages -Publisher
MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app13169049
Keywords
heart rate variability; respiratory frequency; perfusion index; late onset sepsis; premature infants; neonates; predictive monitoring; machine learning
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Recent research suggests that non-linear machine learning methods perform better than linear models in predicting late onset sepsis in newborns. Additionally, when respiratory features are added to the heart rate variability feature set, non-linear methods demonstrate superior performance compared to linear methods.
A significant proportion of babies that are admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) suffer from late onset sepsis (LOS). In order to prevent mortality and morbidity, the early detection of LOS is of the utmost importance. Recent works have found that the use of machine learning techniques might help detect LOS at an early stage. Some works have shown that linear methods (i.e., logistic regression) display a superior performance when predicting LOS. Nevertheless, as research on this topic is still in an early phase, it has not been ruled out that non-linear machine learning (ML) techniques can improve the predictive performance. Moreover, few studies have assessed the effect of parameters other than heart rate variability (HRV). Therefore, the current study investigates the effect of non-linear methods and assesses whether other vital parameters such as respiratory rate, perfusion index, and oxygen saturation could be of added value when predicting LOS. In contrast with the findings in the literature, it was found that non-linear methods showed a superior performance compared with linear models. In particular, it was found that random forest performed best (AUROC: 0.973), 24% better than logistic regression (AUROC: 0.782). Nevertheless, logistic regression was found to perform similarly to some non-linear models when trained with a short training window. Furthermore, when also taking training time into account, K-Nearest Neighbors was found to be the most beneficial (AUROC: 0.950). In line with the literature, we found that training the models on HRV features yielded the best results. Lastly, the results revealed that non-linear methods demonstrated a superior performance compared with linear methods when adding respiratory features to the HRV feature set, which ensured the greatest improvement in terms of AUROC score.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available