4.6 Article

Cyclist Injuries from Tram Track Incidents: A Retrospective 10-Year Analysis

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 13, Issue 21, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app132111861

Keywords

traffic accidents; cyclist; cycling; tram; tram-related injuries; streetcar; fractures; injuries; accident prevention; accidental fall

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzed data on cycling accidents related to tram tracks and found that bike tire wedging was the most frequent accident mechanism and upper limb fractures were the most common injury type. The implementation of certain measures resulted in a significant reduction in injuries at the main injury site.
Trams are widely used for urban public transportation. The aim of this study was to identify the total number of accidents and common injury patterns of tram-system-related cycling injuries. All patients attending the traumatology emergency department of University Hospital of Innsbruck between January 2010 and December 2019 due to tram-track-related bike crashes were identified. Patient demographics; date, time, and mechanism of the accident; type of injury; exact diagnosis and subsequent treatment; as well as direct treatment costs were evaluated and analyzed. A total of 378 patients (56.1% female; mean age: 38.4 years) were identified. Bike tire wedging was the most frequent accident mechanism (95.2%). A total of 108 patients (28.7%) sustained a total number of 135 fractures, predominately of the upper limb. Twenty-six patients (7.0%) required surgical treatment. No patient in this collective died as a result of the injuries sustained in the accident. During the time of this analysis, the city government implemented several measures to increase cyclists' safety. For the main injury site, a sharp reduction in injuries was observed. Urban tram tracks are a significant risk factor for cycling-related injuries. Injuries might be reduced with the implementation of cyclist-friendly safety measures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available