Exploring Analytical Hierarchy Process for Multicriteria Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Slabs

The decision regarding which slab type should be used in a building is generally made by the structural engineer, considering structural efficiency and compatibility with the architectural design, as well as the costs related to the amount of material used in each option. Because of the technical responsibilities inherent to this specialty, the decision-making process neglects to encompass various other factors of consequence that influence the construction process. These considerations include productivity, the visual and aesthetic characteristics of the slab, waste generation, and thermal and acoustic comfort. This paper aims to develop a multicriteria method to assist stakeholders in selecting the most suitable structural system for slabs based on project needs and objectives. The study utilized the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and information from bibliographic research, expert opinion using the Delphi Method, and machine learning on a dataset of over 2000 previously constructed slabs to achieve this goal. The analysis showed that the conventional solid slab type was the top priority, followed by the two-way waffle slab, one-way waffle slab, solid flat slab, and waffle slab. Additionally, the proposed AHP method was effective in developing a decision-making model for companies and the construction sector.

Automated summary

This paper introduces a multicriteria method to assist in selecting the most suitable structural system for slabs based on project needs and objectives. The study used the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and information from bibliographic research, expert opinion, and machine learning to determine the priority of different slab types. The analysis showed that the conventional solid slab type was the top priority, followed by other options.