4.6 Article

Knowledge Reasoning via Jointly Modeling Knowledge Graphs and Soft Rules

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 13, Issue 19, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app131910660

Keywords

distributed representation; knowledge graph; link prediction; logical rule

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Knowledge graph completion (KGC) is an important research direction for addressing the issue of incomplete knowledge graphs. Traditional rule-based reasoning methods have good accuracy and interpretability, but obtaining effective rules on large-scale knowledge graphs is challenging. Embedding-based reasoning methods have high efficiency and scalability, but they cannot fully utilize domain knowledge in the form of logical rules. This paper proposes a novel method that combines rules and embeddings iteratively to achieve a good balance between efficiency and scalability.
Knowledge graphs (KGs) play a crucial role in many applications, such as question answering, but incompleteness is an urgent issue for their broad application. Much research in knowledge graph completion (KGC) has been performed to resolve this issue. The methods of KGC can be classified into two major categories: rule-based reasoning and embedding-based reasoning. The former has high accuracy and good interpretability, but a major challenge is to obtain effective rules on large-scale KGs. The latter has good efficiency and scalability, but it relies heavily on data richness and cannot fully use domain knowledge in the form of logical rules. We propose a novel method that injects rules and learns representations iteratively to take full advantage of rules and embeddings. Specifically, we model the conclusions of rule groundings as 0-1 variables and use a rule confidence regularizer to remove the uncertainty of the conclusions. The proposed approach has the following advantages: (1) It combines the benefits of both rules and knowledge graph embeddings (KGEs) and achieves a good balance between efficiency and scalability. (2) It uses an iterative method to continuously improve KGEs and remove incorrect rule conclusions. Evaluations of two public datasets show that our method outperforms the current state-of-the-art methods, improving performance by 2.7% and 4.3% in mean reciprocal rank (MRR).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available