4.6 Article

Risk assessment of titanium dioxide nanoparticles via oral exposure, including toxicokinetic considerations

Journal

NANOTOXICOLOGY
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages 1515-1525

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17435390.2016.1238113

Keywords

TiO2; kinetic modeling; food; supplements; toothpaste

Funding

  1. Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Titanium dioxide white pigment consists of particles of various sizes, from which a fraction is in the nano range (<100nm). It is applied in food as additive E 171 as well as in other products, such as food supplements and toothpaste. Here, we assessed whether a human health risk can be expected from oral ingestion of these titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2 NPs), based on currently available information. Human health risks were assessed using two different approaches: Approach 1, based on intake, i.e. external doses, and Approach 2, based on internal organ concentrations using a kinetic model in order to account for accumulation over time (the preferred approach). Results showed that with Approach 1, a human health risk is not expected for effects in liver and spleen, but a human health risk cannot be excluded for effects on the ovaries. When based on organ concentrations by including the toxicokinetics of TiO2 NPs (Approach 2), a potential risk for liver, ovaries and testes is found. This difference between the two approaches shows the importance of including toxicokinetic information. The currently estimated risk can be influenced by factors such as absorption, form of TiO2, particle fraction, particle size and physico-chemical properties in relation to toxicity, among others. Analysis of actual particle concentrations in human organs, as well as organ concentrations and effects in liver and the reproductive system after chronic exposure to well-characterized TiO2 (NPs) in animals are recommended to refine this assessment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available