4.1 Article

Algorithms for magnetic symmetry operation search and identification of magnetic space group from magnetic crystal structure

Journal

ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA A-FOUNDATION AND ADVANCES
Volume 79, Issue -, Pages 390-398

Publisher

INT UNION CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
DOI: 10.1107/S2053273323005016

Keywords

magnetic space group; magnetic space-group type; magnetic structure; crystal structure analysis; affine normalizer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents an algorithm for computational crystallography of magnetic materials. It includes the determination of magnetic symmetry operations, identification of magnetic space-group types, transformation to specific settings, and symmetrization of magnetic crystal structures using projection operators.
A crystal symmetry search is crucial for computational crystallography and materials science. Although algorithms and implementations for the crystal symmetry search have been developed, their extension to magnetic space groups (MSGs) remains limited. In this paper, algorithms for determining magnetic symmetry operations of magnetic crystal structures, identifying magnetic space-group types of given MSGs, searching for transformations to a Belov-Neronova-Smirnova (BNS) setting, and symmetrizing the magnetic crystal structures using the MSGs are presented. The determination of magnetic symmetry operations is numerically stable and is implemented with minimal modifications from the existing crystal symmetry search. Magnetic space-group types and transformations to the BNS setting are identified by a two-step approach combining space-group-type identification and the use of affine normalizers. Point coordinates and magnetic moments of the magnetic crystal structures are symmetrized by projection operators for the MSGs. An implementation is distributed with a permissive free software license in spglib v2.0.2: https://github.com/spglib/spglib.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available