4.5 Article

Unifying inflation with early and late dark energy in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity

Journal

PHYSICS OF THE DARK UNIVERSE
Volume 41, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.dark.2023.101238

Keywords

Dark energy; Inflation; Modified gravity; Hubble tension

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the era of precision cosmology, the Hubble tension problem arises from precise measurements of the Hubble constant that differ significantly due to different observational data. To solve this discrepancy, various solutions have been proposed, including considering systematic errors on the observational data and theoretical proposals involving an early dark energy that affects the universe expansion. In this paper, a model of varying cosmological constant in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity framework is introduced, which successfully explains the inflationary era, dark energy epoch, and the discrepancy in the predictions of the Hubble constant.
In the era of precision cosmology, different observational data has led to precise measurements of the Hubble constant that differ significantly, what has been called the Hubble tension problem. In order to solve such a discrepancy, many different solutions have been proposed, from systematic errors on the observational data to theoretical proposals that assume an early dark energy that might affect the universe expansion at the time of recombination. In this paper, a model of varying cosmological con-stant is proposed in the framework of Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity. The corresponding gravitational action is reconstructed and such a model is shown to reproduce well the inflationary era together with dark energy epoch and at the same time to provide an explanation for the discrepancy on the Hubble constant predictions. The transition to a phantom epoch is also realized, avoiding the usual instability problems of ordinary scalar field models.& COPY; 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available