4.6 Article

Dual-gate polysilicon nanoribbon biosensors enable high sensitivity detection of proteins

Journal

NANOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/27/16/165502

Keywords

TFT; biosensor; nanoribbon; pH sensing; avidin; protein sensing; nanowire

Funding

  1. Technology Strategy Board (TSB)
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EPSRC: EP/K502327/1]
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K502327/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. EPSRC [EP/K502327/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We demonstrate the advantages of dual-gate polysilicon nanoribbon biosensors with a comprehensive evaluation of different measurement schemes for pH and protein sensing. In particular, we compare the detection of voltage and current changes when top- and bottom-gate bias is applied. Measurements of pH show that a large voltage shift of 491 mV pH(-1) is obtained in the subthreshold region when the top- gate is kept at a fixed potential and the bottom-gate is varied (voltage sweep). This is an improvement of 16 times over the 30 mV pH(-1) measured using a top-gate sweep with the bottom-gate at a fixed potential. A similar large voltage shift of 175 mV is obtained when the protein avidin is sensed using a bottom-gate sweep. This is an improvement of 20 times compared with the 8.8 mV achieved from a top-gate sweep. Current measurements using bottom-gate sweeps do not deliver the same signal amplification as when using bottom-gate sweeps to measure voltage shifts. Thus, for detecting a small signal change on protein binding, it is advantageous to employ a double-gate transistor and to measure a voltage shift using a bottom-gate sweep. For top- gate sweeps, the use of a dual-gate transistor enables the current sensitivity to be enhanced by applying a negative bias to the bottom-gate to reduce the carrier concentration in the nanoribbon. For pH measurements, the current sensitivity increases from 65% to 149% and for avidin sensing it increases from 1.4% to 2.5%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available