4.6 Article

Advancing the pipeline of cystic fibrosis clinical trials: a new roadmap with a global trial network perspective

Journal

LANCET RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
Volume 11, Issue 10, Pages 932-944

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00297-7

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of modulator therapies for cystic fibrosis has changed clinical trial strategies, dividing the patient population based on eligibility. The development of nucleic acid-based therapies faces challenges due to limited resources and the inability to conduct placebo-controlled trials. Advancing symptomatic therapies is also difficult in a population already receiving modulator treatment.
The growing use of modulator therapies aimed at restoring cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein function in people with cystic fibrosis has fundamentally altered clinical trial strategies needed to advance new therapeutics across an orphan disease population that is now divided by CFTR modulator eligibility. The development of a robust pipeline of nucleic acid-based therapies (NABTs)-initially directed towards the estimated 10% of the cystic fibrosis population who are genetically ineligible for, or intolerant of, CFTR modulators-is dependent on the optimisation of restricted trial participant resources across multiple development programmes, a challenge that will preclude the use of gold standard placebo-controlled trials. Advancement of a full pipeline of symptomatic therapies across the entire cystic fibrosis population will be challenged by smaller effect sizes and uncertainty regarding their clinical importance in a growing modulator-treated population with more mild and stable pulmonary disease. In this Series paper, we aim to lay the foundation for clinical trial strategy and community partnership that must deviate from established and familiar precedent to advance the future pipeline of cystic fibrosis therapeutics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available