4.3 Article

Unequal effects of SARS-CoV-2 infections: model of SARS-CoV-2 dynamics in Cameroon (Sub-Saharan Africa) versus New York State (United States)

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL DYNAMICS
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17513758.2023.2246496

Keywords

COVID-19 unequal effect; vaccination; immunity; self-medication; developed countries; developing countries; burden ratio; >

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Worldwide, the SARS-CoV-2 virus has infected over 691 million people and caused more than 6.9 million deaths. Surprisingly, Sub-Saharan Africa, particularly Cameroon, has experienced the least impact from the pandemic. This study compares the COVID-19 burden between Cameroon, a developing country, and New York State, a developed country, using data-driven mathematical models. It identifies critical parameters that explain the lower disease burden in Cameroon and provides insights for mitigating future major outbreaks.
Worldwide, the recent SARS-CoV-2 virus disease outbreak has infected more than 691,000,000 people and killed more than 6,900,000. Surprisingly, Sub-Saharan Africa has suffered the least from the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Factors that are inherent to developing countries and that contrast with their counterparts in developed countries have been associated with these disease burden differences. In this paper, we developed data-driven COVID-19 mathematical models of two 'extreme': Cameroon, a developing country, and New York State (NYS) located in a developed country. We then identified critical parameters that could be used to explain the lower-than-expected COVID-19 disease burden in Cameroon versus NYS and to help mitigate future major disease outbreaks. Through the introduction of a 'disease burden' function, we found that COVID-19 could have been much more severe in Cameroon than in NYS if the vaccination rate had remained very low in Cameroon and the pandemic had not ended.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available