4.4 Article

Addiction substitution and concurrent recovery in gambling disorder: Who substitutes and why?

Journal

JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL ADDICTIONS
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages 682-696

Publisher

AKADEMIAI KIADO ZRT
DOI: 10.1556/2006.2023.00046

Keywords

addiction substitution; concurrent recovery; gambling disorder; behavioral addictions; addiction recovery

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aims to compare and identify the recovery processes associated with substitution and concurrent recovery in gambling disorder. The findings suggest that addiction substitution often occurs as a substitute coping mechanism, while concurrent recovery is driven by the mutual influence of different addictions. Negative emotional states are common during both addiction substitution and concurrent recovery.
Objectives: When individuals recover from gambling disorder, their involvement in other potentially addictive substances and behaviors may also subsequently increase (substitution) or decrease (concurrent recovery). The objectives of this study were to identify and compare recovery processes associated with substitution and concurrent recovery in gambling disorder. Methods: A mixed-method study was conducted with 185 people who were recovered from gambling disorder. Semi-structured interviews were used to: (i) establish onset and recovery of gambling disorder as well as other substance and behavioral addictions; and (ii) assess processes (e.g., reasons, emotional state, helpfulness) associated with addiction substitution and concurrent recovery. Participants also completed a survey assessing demographic characteristics, gambling behaviors, and psychological characteristics to compare demographic and clinical differences between participants who engaged in addiction substitution, concurrent recovery, or neither (controls). Results: The most frequently reported reason for engaging in addiction substitution was as a substitute coping mechanism. The most reported reason for engaging in concurrent recovery was due to the addictions being mutually influenced. Negative emotional states were common when engaging in both addiction substitution and concurrent recovery. Although the three groups did not differ on gambling characteristics, addiction substitution was associated with greater underlying vulnerabilities including childhood adversity, impulsivity, emotion dysregulation, and, maladaptive coping skills. Conclusion: Transdiagnostic treatments that target the underlying mechanisms of addictions may reduce the likelihood of engaging in addiction substitution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available