4.6 Article

Implementation of Pharmacogenetics in First-Line Care: Evaluation of Its Use by General Practitioners

Journal

GENES
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/genes14101841

Keywords

pharmacogenetics; pharmacogenomics; GP; clinical implementation; CYP450; personalized medicine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the use of pharmacogenetics (PGx) in primary care in the Netherlands, finding that side effects were the main reason for testing and antidepressants were the most commonly tested drugs. The survey revealed a lack of knowledge among general practitioners (GPs) on when and how to use PGx, suggesting a need for more education on the topic.
Pharmacogenetics (PGx) can explain/predict drug therapy outcomes. There is, however, unclarity about the use and usefulness of PGx in primary care. In this study, we investigated PGx tests ordered by general practitioners (GPs) in 2021 at Dept. Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC, and analyzed the gene tests ordered, drugs/drug groups, reasons for testing and single-gene versus panel testing. Additionally, a survey was sent to 90 GPs asking about their experiences and barriers to implementing PGx. In total, 1206 patients and 6300 PGx tests were requested by GPs. CYP2C19 was requested most frequently (17%), and clopidogrel was the most commonly indicated drug (23%). Regarding drug groups, antidepressants (51%) were the main driver for requesting PGx, followed by antihypertensives (26%). Side effects (79%) and non-response (27%) were the main indicators. Panel testing was preferred over single-gene testing. The survey revealed knowledge on when and how to use PGx as one of the main barriers. In conclusion, PGx is currently used by GPs in clinical practice in the Netherlands. Side effects are the main reason for testing, which mostly involves antidepressants. Lack of knowledge is indicated as a major barrier, indicating the need for more education on PGx for GPs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available